Founded 2026

The evidence

What the record adds up to, grouped by country and by theme.

Every claim on this page is carried by an entry that is already published and already sourced. Nothing here is asserted on its own authority - each theme names the records that support it and links straight to them, so any sentence can be checked in two clicks. Where the record is thin, this page says so rather than filling the gap with adjectives.

Germany

Germany appears here more often than any other country, and the record is not anecdotal: the federal government counted the reports itself, the anti-discrimination agency published the letters people received from their banks, and a savings bank restricted a customer's card because of where she was born. Thirty years of German polling asked repeatedly about Russia and almost never about Russians.

The United Kingdom

One case stands for the British approach, and it is a large one: Wimbledon barred players by nationality alone, against the objection of the tours that govern the sport. The measure was not aimed at a state - it was aimed at individuals holding the wrong passport. The United Kingdom is under-documented in this archive relative to its role; that is a gap in what has been written up here, not a shortage of material.

Money and banking

The pattern that touches the most ordinary lives is the bank account. Accounts refused, cards restricted, payments held - decided by nationality or by place of birth rather than by anything the customer did. A Dutch human rights body examined one bank's practice and found against it. These are not sanctions on named individuals; they are institutions applying a category.

Universities and study

Admission closed by passport. A university stopped accepting applicants of one nationality; a state stopped issuing study visas to them; and in Czechia the Public Defender of Rights examined what the universities were doing and said it was discrimination. Whatever a government's quarrel is, it is not with a nineteen-year-old applying to study.

Sport and culture

Competitions and stages closed to people by nationality: tennis players, skiers, pianists, gymnasts. This is the theme where the exclusion has already been tested and found wanting - the Court of Arbitration for Sport held that a ban on athletes for their nationality was discriminatory. The pianists and the gymnasts had no such forum.

Residence and movement

The most consequential measures are the ones that decide where a person may live. Latvia's migration office told hundreds of Russian citizens - many of them long-settled residents - that they had to leave. Visas refused, permits withdrawn, a life of decades made conditional on a language test or a form.

What official bodies found

This is the part hardest to wave away, because none of it comes from us. The EU's own rights agency recorded incidents against Russians and Russian-speakers. The German government answered a parliamentary question with a count. A Czech ombudsman, a Dutch human rights institute and an international sports court each examined a specific practice and each found against it. The pattern is not alleged here; it is documented by the institutions of the countries where it happened.

What this is, and what it is not

This is not a claim that ordinary Germans or Britons hate Russians, and it is not a claim that every measure listed here was taken in bad faith. It is a narrower and better-supported claim: that across banking, universities, sport, culture and residence, people have been treated according to a passport rather than according to anything they did - and that this has been recorded, repeatedly, by the official bodies of the countries where it happened. The archive is incomplete and openly so; the entries that exist are dated, sourced and correctable.

Abstain